Orijen: Everything Vets Wish You Knew

šŸ“‹ Key Takeaways: Quick Answers to Your Burning ORIJEN Questions

ā“ Questionāœ… Quick Answer
Is ORIJEN good quality dog food?Premium 5-star—85-90% animal ingredients, but watch for DCM concerns
Who owns ORIJEN now?Mars, Inc. (acquired February 2023)—same company as Pedigree, Royal Canin, IAMS
Has ORIJEN been recalled?No recalls in U.S./Canada; one 2008 Australia cat food voluntary recall
What’s the protein content?Average 43.8% protein—highest among major brands
Does ORIJEN contain grains?Most formulas grain-free; Amazing Grains line includes ancient grains
Is ORIJEN linked to heart disease?Named in FDA DCM investigation—legume-heavy formulas flagged
How much does ORIJEN cost?$7.40 per pound—among most expensive dog foods available
Does ORIJEN meet AAFCO standards?Yes, all formulas meet AAFCO nutrient profiles for all life stages
Where is ORIJEN manufactured?DogStar Kitchen (Kentucky) and NorthStar Kitchen (Alberta, Canada)
What’s ORIJEN’s carbohydrate content?Average 21.4% carbs—significantly lower than most kibbles

šŸ¢ Mars Bought ORIJEN—And The Premium Pet Food World Panicked

When Mars Petcare announced the $2+ billion acquisition of Champion Petfoods in February 2023, the reaction from ORIJEN loyalists wasn’t just skeptical—it was visceral.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Ownership Timeline

šŸ“… YearšŸ¢ OwneršŸ“‹ What Changed
1985Reinhard Mühlenfeld (founder)Champion Petfoods founded in Alberta, Canada
2001Champion Petfoods spun off as independent companyPremium brands Orijen and Acana developed
2016Bedford Capital & Healthcare of Ontario Pension PlanExpansion into U.S. market with Kentucky facility
2023Mars, Inc. ($2+ billion purchase)Operates as “independent business unit” within Mars Petcare

Mars also owns Pedigree, IAMS, Nutro, Royal Canin, Eukanuba, Greenies, Whiskas, Sheba, Cesar—plus VCA Animal Hospitals, Banfield Pet Hospital, and BluePearl Specialty hospitals.

šŸ’” Critical Insight: Mars now controls pet food brands spanning budget to ultra-premium categories AND employs thousands of veterinarians who recommend those brands. When the company manufacturing Pedigree ($1.50/lb) also owns ORIJEN ($7.40/lb), questions about maintaining premium standards become unavoidable. Pet owners flooded forums with concerns: “Time to find a new Canadian pet food. Quality and product control about to go down.”


🄩 The “85% Meat” Promise—And The Legume Math That Undermines It

ORIJEN’s marketing centers on “biologically appropriate” nutrition with 85-90% animal ingredients. The first five ingredients? Always fresh or raw animal proteins. Sounds revolutionary—until you examine what happens after ingredient number five.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Original Ingredient Breakdown

šŸ“‹ Position🄘 Ingredientāš ļø What It Really Means
#1-5Chicken, turkey, flounder, mackerel, chicken liverFresh proteins lose 70-80% weight after cooking
#6-7Dehydrated chicken and turkeyConcentrated proteins—already moisture-removed
#8-12Red lentils, whole chickpeas, whole pinto beans, whole green peas, lentil fiberLegume cluster—each contains ~25% protein
#13-15Pollock oil, chicken fat, whole eggsFats and additional protein sources

šŸ’” The Fresh Meat Weight Trick: Fresh chicken listed first contains approximately 73% water. After extrusion cooking, that “first ingredient” shrinks to a fraction of its original contribution. The actual dominant protein sources become the dehydrated meats and—here’s the controversy—the legumes.

The Ingredient Splitting Strategy: Notice how legumes appear separately: red lentils, chickpeas, pinto beans, green peas, lentil fiber. If combined and reported as one ingredient, that legume combination would likely rank second or third on the ingredient list—not scattered across positions 8-12.

Legumes contribute approximately 25% protein, which means ORIJEN’s impressive 43.8% average protein content receives significant contribution from plant sources, not exclusively from animal proteins as marketing suggests.


āš ļø The FDA Named ORIJEN—And The Heart Disease Investigation Everyone’s Ignoring

Between 2014 and 2022, the FDA received 1,382 reports of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in dogs. ORIJEN appeared among the 16 brands most frequently reported—with 67 DCM cases naming ORIJEN products.

šŸ“Š FDA DCM Investigation: ORIJEN’s Position

šŸ” FactoršŸ“‹ ORIJEN Profileāš ļø Risk Assessment
Grain-free formulas91% of reported products grain-freeāœ… Matches ORIJEN’s flagship range
Legume content93% contained peas, lentils, chickpeasāœ… ORIJEN formulas heavily legume-based
Affected breedsNon-predisposed breeds developing DCMGolden Retrievers, mixed breeds reported
Reports frequency67 cases naming ORIJEN4th highest among all brands investigated
FDA conclusion“Complex scientific issue involving multiple factors”Investigation ongoing since 2018

šŸ’” The Taurine Confusion: Initially, investigators suspected taurine deficiency. However, most affected dogs had adequate taurine levels. Current theories focus on legumes and potatoes potentially interfering with nutrient absorption—specifically how dogs metabolize cysteine and methionine to synthesize taurine.

Champion Petfoods’ Response: The company conducted a 26-week feeding trial with Labrador Retrievers, finding no taurine deficiency issues. They’ve maintained that “there is no definitive, scientific link between DCM and our foods or grain-free diets.” The FDA responded: “diet has not been eliminated as a potential factor.”

The Reporting Decline: Between August 2020 and November 2022, FDA received only 255 DCM reports—down dramatically from the 2018-2020 peak. Possible explanations include increased public awareness prompting diet switches, formula modifications by manufacturers, or simply reporting fatigue.


šŸ’° ORIJEN Costs $7.40 Per Pound—Here’s The Brutal Math Most Owners Miss

ORIJEN positions itself as ultra-premium nutrition. The price reflects that positioning—but whether the nutrition justifies the expense requires examining real-world feeding costs.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Cost Comparison: Monthly Feeding Expense

šŸ• Dog Sizeāš–ļø Weight🄣 Daily AmountšŸ’° Monthly ORIJEN CostšŸ“Š Budget Alternative Cost
Small20 lbs1 cup$74$25 (Purina Pro Plan)
Medium50 lbs2.5 cups$185$63
Large70 lbs3.5 cups$259$88
Giant100 lbs5 cups$370$126

A 4.5-pound bag costs $33.29 ($7.40/lb). A 25-pound bag averages $140-150 ($5.60-6.00/lb with bulk discount).

Discover  šŸ„‡ The Best Dog Food for a Maltese 🐾

šŸ’” Real Owner Reality Check: One forum user calculated: “With PMR (raw feeding), my dogs eat 133 lbs monthly for $100. With ORIJEN, I’d spend $5.86 per day versus $3.56 for raw. Plus Tucker would need Prednisone for allergies, and Nalah would have seizures requiring phenobarbital—adding $150-300 monthly in vet costs.”

The Hidden Costs: Premium kibble eliminates some veterinary expenses for dogs thriving on it. But for dogs experiencing adverse reactions, the food cost becomes the smallest expense. One Rottweiler owner countered: “You can either pay for extra vet visits, or feed your dogs good food. I choose ORIJEN. Not having misc. vet bills is worth the extra costs.”


šŸ“œ ORIJEN’s Spotless U.S. Recall History—With A Major Asterisk

To date, ORIJEN has never been recalled in the United States or Canada. This represents a genuinely impressive safety record spanning nearly 40 years.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Recall & Legal Timeline

šŸ“… Dateāš ļø EventšŸ“‹ Scope
2008Voluntary recall—Australia cat food onlyIrradiation-induced vitamin A depletion causing illness
2018Class-action lawsuit filedHeavy metals (arsenic, mercury, lead, cadmium, BPA) allegations
2020Lawsuit dismissedCourt found “no concrete evidence” supporting claims
2019FDA DCM investigationORIJEN named among 16 brands with 10+ reports
2022Lawsuit appeals rejectedSecond Circuit upheld summary judgment for Champion
2023Second lawsuit—marketing claimsChallenged “free-run” chicken statements; resolved via packaging changes

šŸ’” The Australia Incident Nobody Discusses: In 2008, cats consuming ORIJEN cat food in Australia developed neurological illness. The culprit? Mandatory gamma irradiation treatment required by Australian law for imported pet foods containing fresh meats. The irradiation depleted vitamin A—and unlike dogs, cats cannot synthesize their own vitamin A. Champion Petfoods proved the government-mandated treatment caused the illness. Australia subsequently banned cat food irradiation in 2009.

The Heavy Metals Controversy: In 2018, plaintiff Jennifer Reitman claimed her dogs “were getting sick” after four years feeding ORIJEN, alleging the food contained harmful levels of arsenic, mercury, lead, and cadmium. Champion Petfoods released a white paper showing:

  • Arsenic: 0.89 mg/kg (limit: 12.50 mg/kg)
  • Cadmium: 0.09 mg/kg (limit: 10.00 mg/kg)
  • Lead: 0.23 mg/kg (limit: 10.00 mg/kg)
  • Mercury: 0.02 mg/kg (limit: 0.27 mg/kg)

All levels fell well below maximum tolerable limits. The lawsuit relied on data from the Clean Label Project—which awarded 5 stars to Alpo while giving ORIJEN Six Fish only 1 star. Courts dismissed the claims as “meritless and based on misinterpretation of the data.”


🧬 “Biologically Appropriate” Sounds Scientific—But What Does It Actually Mean?

ORIJEN’s core marketing concept—”biologically appropriate”—suggests evolutionary alignment with canine dietary needs. The reality involves both genuine nutritional advantages and significant marketing spin.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN’s “Biologically Appropriate” Claims Analyzed

🐺 Claimāœ… Scientific Basisāš ļø Marketing Exaggeration
“WholePrey” ratiosIncluding organs, cartilage provides nutrients without synthetic supplementationWild wolves don’t eat 85% meat—they consume entire prey including stomach contents (vegetation)
“Dogs are carnivores”Dogs have shorter digestive tracts than herbivores, designed for meat digestionDogs are facultative carnivores (omnivores with carnivore preference)—can digest carbs
High protein (43.8%)Supports muscle mass, satiety, metabolic functionMost healthy dogs thrive on 25-30% protein; 43% unnecessary for sedentary pets
Low carbohydrate (21%)Below-average carbs compared to typical kibble (50%+)All kibble requires ~25% starch for extrusion; cannot replicate raw diet structure

šŸ’” The Wild Diet Myth: Marketing implies dogs should eat like their wolf ancestors. However, dogs diverged from wolves 15,000-40,000 years ago and developed amylase genes enabling starch digestion—an evolutionary adaptation wolves lack. Dogs coevolved with humans, consuming human food scraps including grains and vegetables.

The Processing Paradox: ORIJEN touts “fresh and raw ingredients” while simultaneously cooking those ingredients through high-heat extrusion. Fresh chicken enters the process, but exits as heavily processed kibble that lost significant enzymatic activity, vitamins, amino acids, and phytonutrients. The “freeze-dried raw coating” adds back some raw nutrition—but represents a fraction of total volume.


šŸ”¬ Nutritional Analysis: What The Numbers Actually Reveal

Moving beyond marketing language, examining ORIJEN’s guaranteed analysis reveals both exceptional qualities and overlooked limitations.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Original Nutritional Profile (Dry Matter Basis)

šŸ“‹ NutrientšŸ“Š ORIJEN ContentšŸŽÆ AAFCO Minimumāš ļø Assessment
Crude Protein42.9%18% (adult)Exceptional (238% above minimum)
Crude Fat20.7%5.5% (adult)Excellent (376% above minimum)
Carbohydrates22.2% (calculated)No requirementLow (vs. 40-50% in typical kibble)
Fiber4%—Adequate for digestive health
Calcium1.4%0.5% minimumSupports bone health
Phosphorus1.1%0.4% minimumAppropriate Ca:P ratio maintained

Fat-to-Protein Ratio: 44%—indicates moderate-to-high fat relative to protein, appropriate for active dogs.

šŸ’” The Protein Excess Question: Veterinary nutritionists increasingly question whether 43% protein benefits the average pet dog. For working dogs, sporting breeds, or highly active pets, elevated protein supports muscle maintenance and energy. For sedentary companions? The excess protein converts to energy or gets excreted—meaning owners pay premium prices for nutrients their dogs simply eliminate.

The Kidney Disease Myth: Contrary to persistent folklore, high protein does not cause kidney disease in healthy dogs. However, dogs with existing kidney disease require protein restriction. ORIJEN is absolutely contraindicated for dogs with renal issues.

Discover  20 Best Wet Foods for Older Dogs šŸ¶šŸ½ļø

šŸ„ What Veterinarians Actually Think About ORIJEN (The Split Is Revealing)

Veterinary opinions on ORIJEN divide along professional philosophy lines—and those divisions expose deeper conflicts within companion animal nutrition.

šŸ“Š Veterinary Perspective Breakdown

šŸ‘Øā€āš•ļø Vet TypešŸ“‹ Typical ORIJEN OpinionšŸ’” Reasoning
General PractitionersMixed to skeptical“No clinical trials proving digestibility,” “Big price tag doesn’t equal better”
Veterinary NutritionistsCautious due to DCM concernsRecommend grain-inclusive alternatives pending FDA investigation conclusion
Holistic/Integrative VetsOften recommendAligns with “species-appropriate” nutrition philosophy
Specialty Practice VetsIndividual case basisExcellent for some dogs, problematic for others

The Clinical Trials Controversy: One vet explained the skepticism bluntly: “Those foods, despite having a big price tag and apparently high quality ingredients, are not good. They have done no clinical trials. Sure, whitefish sounds great, but can the dog digest it properly? Can it really absorb all the nutrients? They have NO idea.”

šŸ’” The Hidden Conflict: Mars owns ORIJEN—and also owns VCA Animal Hospitals, Banfield Pet Hospital, and BluePearl. When the company manufacturing the food employs the veterinarians recommending it, conflicts of interest become unavoidable. However, this conflict cuts both ways: Hill’s Science Diet and Royal Canin (Nestle Purina) also provide significant veterinary school sponsorships and employ nutritionists who develop curriculum.

The Evidence-Based Divide: Board-certified veterinary nutritionists prioritize feeding trials and peer-reviewed research. ORIJEN’s approach emphasizes ingredient quality and evolutionary dietary principles. Both camps present legitimate arguments—but neither possesses definitive proof their philosophy produces superior long-term health outcomes.


šŸ“¦ ORIJEN Product Line Guide: Which Formula Fits Your Dog

ORIJEN offers extensive variety across grain-free and grain-inclusive lines, each targeting specific nutritional approaches.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Formula Selection Guide

šŸ• Dog ProfilešŸ“¦ Recommended ORIJEN Formula⭐ Protein/Fat/Carb
All Life Stages (General)Original Grain-Free38% / 18% / 20%
High-Energy AdultsRegional Red (red meats)38% / 18% / 20%
Fish-Sensitive StomachSix Fish Grain-Free38% / 18% / 22%
Grain-Tolerant AdultsOriginal Amazing Grains38% / 16% / 27%
Puppies (All Breeds)Puppy Grain-Free or Amazing Grains38% / 20% / 20%
Large Breed PuppiesPuppy Large Grain-Free or Amazing Grains38% / 16% / 23%
Weight ManagementFit & Trim42% / 13% / 21%
SeniorsSenior (same as adult formulas)38% / 15% / 21%

šŸ’” The Amazing Grains Pivot: Launched as ORIJEN’s response to DCM concerns, the Amazing Grains line includes oats, quinoa, and chia seeds while maintaining 90% animal ingredients. This represents Champion Petfoods’ hedge—offering grain-inclusive options while preserving the high-protein brand identity. However, some owners report dogs showing less enthusiasm for Amazing Grains compared to grain-free variants.


šŸŽØ The Freeze-Dried Coating—Genius Innovation or Expensive Gimmick?

ORIJEN’s signature freeze-dried raw coating represents their most distinctive processing innovation—and their most effective palatability enhancer.

šŸ“Š Freeze-Dried Coating Analysis

āœ… Genuine Advantagesāš ļø Legitimate Limitations
Preserves enzymes, vitamins, amino acids destroyed in extrusionCoating represents <5% of kibble volume—most nutrients still from cooked base
Dramatically improves palatability—dogs notice immediatelyAdds significant cost to production
Provides “raw nutrition” without refrigeration requirementsMarketing implies more raw content than actually present
Enhances aroma appealing to carnivore preferencesFreeze-drying itself requires energy-intensive processing

šŸ’” Real Owner Experiences: “Open a bag of ORIJEN Original, and you’ll notice the difference immediately. Dogs notice it too.” Approximately 66% of owners report dogs “love it” or transition enthusiastically, even formerly picky eaters. The Six Fish formula particularly wins over reluctant eaters due to fish’s aromatic properties.

However, the remaining 34% includes dogs rejecting ORIJEN—and at $7.40/lb, palatability failures become expensive experiments.


āœ… The Honest ORIJEN Pros and Cons Assessment

šŸ“Š Complete ORIJEN Evaluation

āœ… Genuine AdvantagesāŒ Legitimate Concerns
85-90% animal ingredients—highest among major brands$7.40/lb—among most expensive dog foods available
Average 43.8% protein, 19% fat—excellent macronutrient profileNamed in FDA DCM investigation with 67 reported cases
No recalls in U.S./Canada in 40-year historyHeavy legume content (peas, lentils, chickpeas) raises nutrient absorption questions
Manufactured in company-owned facilitiesNow owned by Mars—same parent as Pedigree and IAMS
Low carbohydrate (21%) compared to typical kibble (50%)Protein excess unnecessary for sedentary dogs
Freeze-dried coating enhances palatabilityNot suitable for dogs with kidney disease or protein restrictions
Meets AAFCO standards for all life stagesAmazing Grains line receives mixed palatability reviews
Transparent ingredient sourcingUltra-processed despite “fresh/raw” marketing language

šŸŽÆ Who Should—and Shouldn’t—Feed ORIJEN

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Suitability Assessment

āœ… Excellent Fit ForāŒ Not Recommended For
Working dogs, sporting breeds, highly active petsDogs with diagnosed or suspected kidney disease
Owners prioritizing ingredient quality above costOwners on tight budgets ($370/month for large breeds)
Dogs thriving on high-protein, low-carb dietsDogs with legume sensitivities
Puppies requiring nutrient-dense growth supportBreeds genetically predisposed to DCM (Dobermans, Great Danes)
Dogs with corn/wheat/soy allergiesDogs requiring veterinary therapeutic diets
Owners able to absorb $7.40/lb food costsSedentary senior dogs with lower protein requirements

šŸ”¬ The Bottom Line: What Vets Really Wish You Understood

ORIJEN occupies a unique and controversial position in companion animal nutrition: ingredient quality that genuinely exceeds most competitors, delivered through ultra-processing that contradicts “biologically appropriate” marketing, at prices that eliminate accessibility for most pet owners, while carrying unresolved DCM investigation implications.

Discover  20 Best Dog Foods for French Bulldogs

The veterinary consensus—where one exists—acknowledges ORIJEN’s exceptional ingredient standards while maintaining legitimate concerns about long-term feeding implications. Board-certified nutritionists increasingly recommend grain-inclusive alternatives pending definitive DCM research conclusions. Holistic practitioners praise ORIJEN’s evolutionary dietary alignment. General practitioners split based on individual clinical experiences.

šŸ’” The Question That Matters Most: Not “is ORIJEN the best dog food?”—but rather “does ORIJEN meet MY dog’s specific needs, MY budget constraints, and MY risk tolerance regarding ongoing DCM investigations?” Answer that honestly, considering your individual dog’s health status, activity level, breed predispositions, and your financial capacity—and you’ll make the right choice.

For dogs thriving on ORIJEN without adverse effects, the food delivers exceptional nutrition justifying the premium price. For dogs experiencing digestive issues, reduced energy, or cardiac concerns, or for owners unable to sustain $200-370 monthly food expenses, exploring alternatives makes practical sense.


FAQs


šŸ’¬ “My vet says ORIJEN hasn’t done clinical trials and I should feed Science Diet instead. Is that true?”

This question exposes the clinical trials versus ingredient quality debate dividing veterinary nutrition professionals.

šŸ“Š Clinical Trials: ORIJEN vs. Hill’s Science Diet

šŸ”¬ Research TypešŸ“‹ ORIJEN ApproachšŸ„ Hill’s Science Diet Approach
AAFCO Feeding TrialsUses formulation method meeting AAFCO nutrient profilesConducts live animal feeding trials (8 dogs for 6 months)
Long-term StudiesLimited published independent researchExtensive university-partnered studies, some spanning years
Digestibility StudiesConducted internally; specific data not publicly availablePublished digestibility coefficients for most formulas
Peer-Reviewed ResearchConducted DCM-focused taurine study (26 weeks, Labrador Retrievers)Hundreds of published studies in veterinary journals

šŸ’” The Truth Behind The Criticism: Your vet’s concern has merit—ORIJEN uses the formulation method for AAFCO compliance (nutrient analysis only) rather than conducting feeding trials with live dogs. However, Hill’s extensive research also receives veterinary school sponsorship funding, creating potential bias toward their products.

The Missing Nuance: Feeding trials identify acute nutritional deficiencies within six months but don’t necessarily predict 10-year outcomes. Conversely, superior ingredients don’t guarantee superior digestibility without verification. Both approaches have limitations—and neither proves long-term health optimization definitively.


šŸ’¬ “Should I switch my dog off ORIJEN because of the DCM investigation?”

This question requires understanding your individual dog’s risk factors rather than making blanket decisions based on population-level data.

šŸ“Š Personal DCM Risk Assessment

šŸ• Risk Factorāš ļø Higher Risk (Consider Alternatives)āœ… Lower Risk (Monitoring Acceptable)
BreedDoberman, Great Dane, Boxer, Cocker Spaniel, Golden RetrieverBreeds without genetic DCM predisposition
Current Diet DurationFed grain-free ORIJEN >12 monthsFed <6 months OR grain-inclusive Amazing Grains
Cardiac SymptomsCoughing, exercise intolerance, lethargy, fainting episodesNo cardiac symptoms observed
Taurine LevelsNot tested OR tested lowBlood taurine levels normal (requires veterinary testing)
Vet RecommendationsCardiologist or nutritionist recommends diet changeNo specific concerns raised

šŸ’” The Veterinary Cardiologist Perspective: Dr. Josh Stern, board-certified veterinary cardiologist who co-authored the influential JAVMA paper on diet-associated DCM, notes that many DCM cases improved after diet changes and taurine supplementation—unlike genetic DCM, which doesn’t respond to dietary intervention.

The Practical Protocol: If feeding ORIJEN grain-free formulas, consider annual taurine testing (blood test, approximately $150-200). If values fall in the low-normal or below-normal range, discuss diet modification with your veterinarian. Golden Retrievers show particular DCM susceptibility on grain-free diets—owners of this breed should strongly consider grain-inclusive alternatives.


šŸ’¬ “ORIJEN is so expensive. Are there comparable alternatives at lower prices?”

Several brands deliver similar ingredient quality and macronutrient profiles at 30-50% lower costs.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Alternatives Cost Comparison

šŸ·ļø BrandšŸ’° Price/LbšŸ“Š Protein %šŸ“‹ Key Difference from ORIJEN
ORIJEN Original$7.4043.8%Premium benchmark
Acana (same manufacturer)$4.00-5.0029-35%Less fresh meat, more meat meals; same facilities
Farmina N&D Ancestral Grain$4.50-5.5030-33%Italian-made; excellent grain-inclusive option
Open Farm$5.00-6.0024-30%Humanely raised proteins; traceable sourcing
Nulo Freestyle$4.00-4.5030-34%Lower legume content than ORIJEN
Fromm Four-Star$3.00-3.5024-30%Family-owned; grain-inclusive; lower price point

šŸ’” The Acana Strategy: Champion Petfoods (Mars) manufactures both ORIJEN and Acana in identical facilities. Acana uses more meat meals (pre-dried proteins) and less fresh meat, reducing costs while maintaining quality. For many dogs, Acana delivers 70-80% of ORIJEN’s benefits at 45-55% of the cost.

The Kirkland Signature Secret: Costco’s Kirkland Signature Nature’s Domain is manufactured by Diamond Pet Foods using quality ingredients at $1.80-2.00/lb. While not matching ORIJEN’s meat content, it provides grain-free nutrition at 73% lower cost.


šŸ’¬ “My dog’s stool became loose after switching to ORIJEN. Is this normal or a bad sign?”

Digestive upset during ORIJEN transition occurs frequently—but distinguishing normal adjustment from genuine intolerance matters critically.

šŸ“Š Transitional vs. Food Intolerance Indicators

ā° TimelinešŸ“‹ Normal Transition Responseāš ļø Food Intolerance/Problem
Days 1-3Slightly softer stool acceptableWatery diarrhea, mucus, or blood
Days 4-7Gradual firmingPersistent loose stool or worsening
Week 2+Normal, well-formed stoolContinued digestive issues
Gas/FlatulenceIncreased initially, subsiding by week 2Excessive, persistent, foul-smelling gas

šŸ’” The High-Protein Adjustment Period: ORIJEN’s 43% protein represents a dramatic increase from typical kibbles (22-28%). Dogs’ digestive systems require 10-14 days to upregulate protein-digesting enzymes. Rushing transition causes digestive overwhelm.

Proper ORIJEN Transition Protocol:

  • Days 1-3: 25% ORIJEN, 75% old food
  • Days 4-6: 50% ORIJEN, 50% old food
  • Days 7-9: 75% ORIJEN, 25% old food
  • Days 10+: 100% ORIJEN

For dogs with sensitive stomachs, extend transition to 14-21 days.

The Legume Gas Factor: Multiple owners report: “I know of lots of people who feed ORIJEN and love it. However it gave mine horrible gas.” Legumes (peas, lentils, chickpeas) produce flatulence due to oligosaccharides humans and dogs struggle to digest. For some dogs, this subsides within 2-3 weeks as gut microbiome adapts. For others, it persists indefinitely.


šŸ’¬ “Can high-protein food like ORIJEN damage my dog’s kidneys?”

This myth persists despite decades of research disproving it—but the truth requires important nuance.

šŸ“Š Protein and Kidney Health: Evidence-Based Facts

šŸ”¬ Statementāœ… Truthāš ļø Critical Qualifier
High protein causes kidney disease in healthy dogsFALSENo evidence in peer-reviewed literature
High protein worsens existing kidney diseaseTRUEDogs with diagnosed renal disease require protein restriction
High protein requires more kidney workTRUEHealthy kidneys handle this easily; diseased kidneys struggle
Older dogs need lower proteinFALSESenior dogs often need more protein to maintain muscle mass

šŸ’” The Veterinary Consensus: Board-certified veterinary nutritionists agree: high-protein diets do not cause kidney disease in healthy dogs. However, once kidney disease develops, protein restriction becomes essential to reduce metabolic waste (urea, creatinine) that damaged kidneys can’t filter efficiently.

The Preventive Testing Strategy: For dogs over age 7, annual bloodwork including BUN (blood urea nitrogen), creatinine, and SDMA (symmetric dimethylarginine) screens for early kidney disease. If values elevate, dietary protein should decrease—ORIJEN becomes contraindicated.

The Geriatric Protein Paradox: Contrary to folklore suggesting senior dogs need less protein, research demonstrates older dogs often require increased protein (28-32%) to combat sarcopenia (age-related muscle loss). Unless kidney disease exists, ORIJEN’s 43% protein benefits many seniors.


šŸ’¬ “I’ve fed ORIJEN for years with great results. Should I worry about the Mars acquisition changing quality?”

Corporate acquisitions of premium pet food brands follow predictable patterns—and owner vigilance becomes essential.

šŸ“Š Post-Acquisition Quality Monitoring Strategy

šŸ“‹ ActionšŸ” What To Monitorāš ļø Red Flags
Photograph current bag ingredientsCompare every new bag purchasedIngredients moving down list; new fillers appearing
Track manufacturing location“Made in Kentucky” vs. “Made in Canada” statementShifts from one facility to another may signal changes
Monitor stool qualityConsistency, frequency, odorSudden changes suggesting formula adjustments
Assess coat conditionShininess, shedding levels, skin healthDullness, increased shedding, dry skin
Watch palatabilityEnthusiasm at mealtimesSudden reluctance to eat previously loved food

šŸ’” Historical Pattern Analysis: When Mars acquired Royal Canin (2001), the brand maintained quality but increased prices steadily. When Nestle purchased Purina (2001), formulations gradually shifted toward more economical ingredients over 3-5 years. When Colgate-Palmolive sold Hill’s to Colgate-Palmolive (wait, they still own it), quality remained consistent.

The Independent Business Unit Promise: Mars states Champion Petfoods operates as an “independent business unit”—theoretically preserving autonomy. However, Mars’ track record with IAMS (purchased from P&G in 2014) shows gradual quality erosion as ownership prioritized profit margins over ingredient premiumization.

The Pragmatic Approach: One experienced owner summarized: “I take a photo of the ingredients in my current large bag and compare each time I purchase. Might push me to go raw.” This strategy provides objective evidence rather than relying on subjective impressions.


šŸ’¬ “Does the Amazing Grains line avoid DCM risks, or is it just marketing?”

ORIJEN’s Amazing Grains line represents Champion Petfoods’ strategic response to DCM concerns—but whether it meaningfully reduces risk requires examining formula differences.

šŸ“Š ORIJEN Grain-Free vs. Amazing Grains Comparison

šŸ“‹ Formula Component🚫 Grain-Free Original🌾 Amazing Grains Original
Primary CarbohydratesRed lentils, chickpeas, pinto beans, green peasSteel-cut oats, oat groats, millet, sorghum, quinoa
Legume Content5 legume sources in top 15 ingredients2 legume sources (lower on list)
Animal Ingredients85% animal ingredients90% animal ingredients
Protein38%38%
Carbohydrates20%27% (slightly higher due to grains)

šŸ’” The FDA’s Shifting Focus: Initially, the investigation emphasized “grain-free” diets. Updated FDA statements note: “The investigation includes grain-free AND grain-inclusive dog food varieties.” The common factor appears to be high legume content, not grain absence.

The Legume Reduction Reality: Amazing Grains formulas contain significantly fewer legumes than grain-free variants. If legumes truly interfere with taurine synthesis (current leading theory), Amazing Grains theoretically reduces risk. However, no published studies specifically compare DCM incidence between ORIJEN grain-free and Amazing Grains formulas.

Palatability Trade-off: Multiple owners report: “The Amazing Grains line has received mixed feedback—some dogs take to it immediately, while others seem less enthusiastic compared to the grain-free formulas.” If your dog refuses Amazing Grains, the DCM risk reduction becomes irrelevant.


šŸ’¬ “Is ORIJEN’s ‘WholePrey’ philosophy really better than traditional dog food?”

The WholePrey concept—including muscle meat, organs, cartilage, and bone—delivers genuine nutritional advantages while simultaneously overstating evolutionary dietary mimicry.

šŸ“Š WholePrey Advantages vs. Marketing Exaggeration

🄩 WholePrey Componentāœ… Nutritional Benefitāš ļø Marketing Oversell
Organ meats (liver, heart, kidney)Rich in vitamins A, B, D, E, K; CoQ10; taurineDogs don’t need organ meat—nutritionally complete without it
CartilageNatural glucosamine and chondroitin for joint supportAmounts insufficient for therapeutic joint disease treatment
BoneCalcium and phosphorus in natural ratiosSynthetic calcium works identically; no absorption advantage proven
Muscle meat diversityVaried amino acid profiles from different protein sourcesSingle high-quality protein source provides complete amino acids

šŸ’” The Wild Diet Reality Check: ORIJEN marketing implies wild canids consume 85-90% meat. Actual wolf diet analysis shows:

  • Muscle meat: 40-50%
  • Organs: 10-15%
  • Bone/cartilage: 10-15%
  • Stomach contents (partially digested vegetation): 10-20%
  • Seasonal vegetation/berries: 5-10%

Wolves consuming herbivorous prey derive significant nutrition from the pre-digested plant matter in prey stomach contents. ORIJEN provides no equivalent fiber/plant nutrient source from “prey stomach contents”—instead using legumes, which deliver different nutritional profiles.

The Genuine Advantage: Including organs, cartilage, and bone does reduce reliance on synthetic vitamin/mineral supplementation. ORIJEN formulas contain fewer added vitamins/minerals than competitors—a legitimate quality marker. However, whether “natural” vitamins from organs outperform synthetic supplementation remains scientifically unproven.


šŸ’¬ “My Golden Retriever loves ORIJEN, but I keep seeing warnings about Goldens and grain-free food. What should I do?”

Golden Retrievers appear disproportionately represented in DCM reports—and this breed requires special consideration when feeding grain-free diets.

šŸ“Š Golden Retriever DCM Risk Factors

šŸ” Risk Factorāš ļø Why Goldens Are SpecialšŸŽÆ Recommendation
Genetic PredispositionSome Golden lines carry DCM susceptibility genesAnnual cardiac screening (echocardiogram) if feeding grain-free
Taurine MetabolismGoldens may have unique taurine synthesis/metabolism inefficienciesBlood taurine testing every 6-12 months
Reporting BiasGolden community mobilized awareness; higher testing/reporting ratesMay not indicate truly elevated risk vs. other breeds
Diet DurationMany affected Goldens fed grain-free diets >1 yearIf continuing ORIJEN, limit to 6-12 months then rotate to grain-inclusive

šŸ’” The University of California Davis Study: Research by Dr. Joshua Stern found taurine-deficient DCM in Golden Retrievers consuming grain-free diets. However, genetic testing revealed some affected dogs carried DCM-associated gene mutations, suggesting multifactorial causation (genetics + diet interaction).

The Conservative Protocol for Golden Retrievers:

  1. If currently feeding ORIJEN grain-free: Switch to Amazing Grains line OR rotate to grain-inclusive brand
  2. If dog thrives uniquely on ORIJEN: Annual echocardiogram ($300-600) + 6-month taurine testing ($150-200)
  3. If any cardiac symptoms emerge: Immediate veterinary cardiology consultation

The Individual Decision: One Golden owner shared: “My 12-year-old was diagnosed with hemangiosarcoma last year and I continued feeding ORIJEN up until a month ago when he decided he was too good for kibble!” For dogs thriving without cardiac symptoms, continuing ORIJEN with monitoring represents acceptable risk. For owners preferring maximum caution, switching to grain-inclusive alternatives eliminates uncertainty.


šŸ’¬ “ORIJEN lists five fresh meats first, but then adds dehydrated chicken and turkey. Isn’t that the same protein counted twice?”

This question identifies ORIJEN’s most clever—and most controversial—ingredient positioning strategy.

šŸ“Š Fresh vs. Dehydrated Protein: The Weight Reality

🄩 Ingredient TypešŸ“Š Pre-Cooking WeightšŸ”„ Post-Cooking WeightšŸ“‹ Actual Contribution
Fresh chicken (ingredient #1)100 lbs (73% water)27 lbs (after water loss)Becomes minor contributor
Fresh turkey (ingredient #2)100 lbs (70% water)30 lbs (after water loss)Becomes minor contributor
Fresh flounder (ingredient #3)100 lbs (80% water)20 lbs (after water loss)Becomes minor contributor
Dehydrated chicken (ingredient #6)100 lbs (12% moisture)88 lbs (minimal change)Actual dominant protein source
Dehydrated turkey (ingredient #7)100 lbs (12% moisture)88 lbs (minimal change)Actual dominant protein source

šŸ’” The Pre-Cooking Weight Loophole: AAFCO regulations require listing ingredients by pre-cooking weight. Fresh meats arrive heavy with water. After extrusion cooking (190-250°F), that water evaporates. The dehydrated meats listed sixth and seventh contribute more actual protein to finished kibble than the fresh meats listed first through third—but AAFCO rules permit the misleading sequence.

Is This Deceptive? Technically legal under AAFCO labeling requirements. Ethically questionable? Many nutritionists argue yes—it creates false impressions about actual ingredient contributions. However, ORIJEN isn’t unique in this practice; most premium brands employ similar strategies.

The Bottom Line: ORIJEN’s protein genuinely derives primarily from animal sources—just not in the proportions the ingredient list superficially suggests. The dehydrated meats (ingredients 6-7) plus the meat meals provide the bulk of animal protein, supplemented by the fresh meats and legumes.


šŸ’¬ “After Mars bought ORIJEN, should I expect quality to decline like what happened with other brands?”

Corporate acquisitions follow predictable patterns—and examining Mars’ historical track record with acquired brands reveals likely trajectories.

šŸ“Š Mars Acquisition Track Record: Quality Impact Analysis

šŸ¢ Brand AcquiredšŸ“… Acquisition YearšŸ“‹ Post-Acquisition Changesā±ļø Timeline
Royal Canin2001Quality maintained; prices increased 30-40%; manufacturing expanded globallyGradual over 5-10 years
IAMS/Eukanuba2014 (from P&G)Quality declined subtly; ingredient sourcing shifted; prices increased 15-20%Noticeable within 2-3 years
Nutro2007 (from Del Monte)Mid-tier positioning maintained; recipes reformulated multiple timesOngoing adjustments
Greenies2006 (from S&M NuTec)Quality improved initially; prices increased; safety incidents decreasedPositive trajectory

šŸ’” The Independent Business Unit Reality: Mars claims Champion Petfoods operates independently—but “independence” has limits. Mars will pressure for:

  • Cost optimization: Sourcing less expensive ingredient suppliers while maintaining quality minimums
  • Manufacturing efficiency: Capacity utilization improvements, potentially affecting batch quality consistency
  • Price increases: Leveraging ORIJEN’s premium positioning for margin expansion
  • Market share growth: Pressure to expand distribution, potentially compromising specialty retailer relationships

The Vigilance Strategy: Photograph current ingredient panels. Note manufacturing location on each bag. Track stool quality, coat condition, and palatability monthly. At the first sign of degradation, explore alternatives—ORIJEN’s premium price requires premium performance.

The Optimistic Scenario: Mars has successfully maintained Royal Canin’s quality for 20+ years. If they apply similar respect to Champion Petfoods’ reputation, ORIJEN could remain excellent. The pessimistic scenario mirrors IAMS—gradual ingredient erosion prioritizing profit margins. Reality likely falls between extremes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top