Most Reported Side Effects of Yunnan Baiyao for Dogs

Key Takeaways: Side Effects Reality Check 💊

❓ Critical Question	✅ Evidence-Based Answer
What’s the #1 most reported side effect?	Gastrointestinal upset (vomiting, diarrhea)—but controlled trials found ZERO
How common are side effects?	Unknown—no incidence data; studies found none, clinicians report “common”
Can it damage the liver?	Maybe—”can elevate liver enzymes with prolonged use” but no quantified risk
Do side effects require stopping medication?	Rarely—most described as “mild” and often resolve with food
Are side effects worse at higher doses?	Unknown—highest-dose studies found no effects at all
Can dogs become allergic over time?	Yes—”sensitivities can develop with repeated exposure”
What about chest pain in dogs?	Listed as side effect but dogs can’t report pain—how would we know?
Is it safe long-term?	Unknown—”limited studies to identify side effects of long-term use”
Does giving with food help?	Anecdotally yes for GI upset; no controlled data
Should I monitor bloodwork?	Yes for liver enzymes if using >2-4 weeks, but no standard protocol exists

---

🤮 “The Gastrointestinal Upset Everyone Reports (That Clinical Trials Never Found)”

Every veterinary resource lists GI upset—vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, stomach upset—as the most common side effect of Yunnan Baiyao. Yunnan Baiyao USA’s dosing guide states it plainly: “The most common side effect of Yunnan Baiyao is stomach upset i.e. vomiting and diarrhea.” VCA Animal Hospitals lists the same. PetMD warns of the same. Veterinary Partner at VIN describes it identically.

Yet when University of Calgary researchers administered Yunnan Baiyao to 8 healthy beagles in two separate controlled trials—with comprehensive physical examinations, blood work monitoring, and systematic observation—they reported: “No adverse effects were noted throughout the study according to the results of physical examination.” Not “minimal adverse effects.” Not “mild GI upset that resolved.” Zero. None. Nothing.

🤢 Gastrointestinal Side Effects: The Evidence Paradox

📊 What Source Reports	🔬 Evidence Quality	😷 Clinical Reality	⚠️ The Disconnect
“Most common side effect: vomiting & diarrhea”	Clinical practice reports, no incidence data	Dogs vomit/have diarrhea; attributed to Yunnan Baiyao	No controlled data linking supplement to GI upset
Controlled studies: zero GI effects	High-quality placebo-controlled trials	8 beagles, 1000mg BID for 5 treatments, no effects	Healthy dogs ≠ sick bleeding dogs
“Nausea” listed as common	Veterinary resources repeat this claim	Dogs can’t report nausea; inferred from behavior	How do we distinguish nausea from illness, anxiety, cancer?
“Decreased appetite/loss of appetite”	Reported in multiple sources	Dogs refuse food after medication	Is it the supplement or medication aversion from taste?
“Stomach upset”	Vague catchall term	Encompasses everything from mild discomfort to severe vomiting	No objective measurement; owner perception
“Give with food to reduce GI effects”	Universal recommendation	Anecdotally helps; no controlled comparison	If trials found no GI effects, what is food preventing?

💡 The Healthy Dog vs. Sick Dog Problem: The University of Calgary studies used “apparently healthy, client-owned dogs” or “healthy University of Calgary owned beagles.” These were dogs with normal baseline health, normal organ function, and no concurrent illnesses. They received Yunnan Baiyao alone—no other medications, no chemotherapy, no NSAIDs, no underlying bleeding tumors causing systemic illness.

Real-world veterinary use? Dogs with hemangiosarcoma bleeding into their abdomen, dogs post-surgery receiving tramadol + carprofen + gabapentin, dogs with liver masses and compromised hepatic function, dogs nauseous from chemotherapy, dogs stressed from hospitalization. When these dogs vomit 2 hours after receiving Yunnan Baiyao, veterinarians and owners naturally attribute it to the supplement they just administered.

But correlation is not causation. The vomiting could be:

• The underlying cancer causing nausea
• Chemotherapy side effects
• Interaction with other medications (tramadol commonly causes vomiting)
• Stress and anxiety from illness
• The terrible taste/smell of Yunnan Baiyao causing learned food aversion
• Actual Yunnan Baiyao-induced gastric irritation

We don’t know which, because no one has conducted placebo-controlled trials in sick dogs with the conditions Yunnan Baiyao is actually prescribed for.

🚨 The Taste Aversion Problem: Multiple owners in hemangiosarcoma support groups report the same phenomenon: Once dogs taste Yunnan Baiyao, they refuse it violently. One owner described: “To me, it doesn’t smell good, per se, but to dogs, it smells wretched—and once they’ve gotten a taste, they will never get near another again.”

This isn’t listed as a “side effect” in veterinary literature, but it creates genuine clinical problems. Dogs who experience nausea during the first dose develop conditioned taste aversion—they associate the smell/taste with feeling sick and will hide, clamp jaws shut, or vomit any food containing the herbal smell. This sabotages treatment compliance, forces owners into stressful pilling battles, and causes additional stress to already-sick dogs.

The “Give With Food” Paradox: Every veterinary source recommends “give with food to reduce gastrointestinal side effects.” But if controlled trials at 4x normal dose found zero GI effects, what exactly is the food preventing?

The most likely explanation: The food doesn’t prevent side effects from Yunnan Baiyao itself—it prevents the nausea/vomiting triggered by the horrible taste hitting an empty stomach. It’s not pharmacological GI irritation being buffered by food; it’s sensory disgust being masked by palatable food.

---

🫀 “The Liver Enzyme Warning Buried in Every Label (With Zero Data on Actual Risk)”

Multiple veterinary sources warn that Yunnan Baiyao “can cause an increase in liver enzymes” with prolonged use, yet not a single published study has quantified this risk. We don’t know:

• What percentage of dogs develop elevated enzymes?
• At what dose does risk increase?
• After how many days/weeks of use?
• How severe are the elevations (2x normal? 10x normal?)?
• Do enzymes normalize when stopped?
• Does the “5 days on, 5 days off” cycling reduce risk?
• Are certain breeds or health conditions more susceptible?

🧪 Liver Enzyme Elevation: The Unknown Risk

⚠️ What Vets Warn	📊 Available Evidence	🔍 What’s Actually Known	💊 Clinical Guidance
“Can cause elevated liver enzymes”	Zero published studies quantifying risk	No incidence data, no dose-response data	Warning based on… what exactly?
“Use with caution in dogs with liver disease”	Logical extrapolation from enzyme concern	If it elevates enzymes in healthy dogs, worse in diseased livers?	Assumes risk exists but unproven
“Not recommended long-term due to liver consequences”	PetMD explicit warning	No definition of “long-term” (weeks? months?)	Arbitrary caution without data
“Often used every other day or limited period”	Yunnan Baiyao USA, VCA guidance	Cycling supposedly protects liver	Zero evidence this helps
“5 days on, 5 days off”	Universal cycling recommendation	Folklore; no studies validate this protocol	Everyone recommends it; no one tested it
Baseline + monitoring liver panels recommended	Logical precaution if risk exists	No standard monitoring protocol exists	Good practice but based on unknown risk

💡 The Evidence Void: The University of Calgary studies—the only controlled trials with comprehensive monitoring—found no liver enzyme elevations in dogs receiving 1000mg twice daily for 5 consecutive treatments. Blood was drawn at baseline, 2 hours post-treatment, and 24 hours post-treatment. If Yunnan Baiyao causes acute liver enzyme elevation, these studies should have detected it.

They didn’t.

So where does the liver enzyme warning come from? Clinical practice reports—dogs on long-term Yunnan Baiyao (often months of daily or near-daily dosing for chronic hemangiosarcoma management) who develop elevated liver enzymes on routine bloodwork.

But consider the confounding factors:

• Dogs with hemangiosarcoma often have liver involvement (metastases, primary liver tumors)
• Dogs with splenic tumors experience hepatic hypoxia when bleeding occurs
• Dogs on chemotherapy (doxorubicin, others) have hepatotoxic drugs
• Dogs on NSAIDs (carprofen, meloxicam) have documented liver effects
• Dogs with chronic illness have stress-induced hepatic changes

When a dog with splenic hemangiosarcoma, receiving Yunnan Baiyao + carprofen + doxorubicin, develops mildly elevated ALT after 8 weeks of treatment, which drug caused it? Veterinarians attribute it to Yunnan Baiyao because:

1. It’s the herbal supplement (supplements are viewed with more suspicion than FDA-approved drugs)
2. It’s the “unknown” ingredient formula
3. Traditional Chinese medicine has historical hepatotoxicity concerns with certain herbs
4. Aconitum (now disclosed in the formula) has known toxicity at high doses

But attribution is not evidence. Without controlled trials comparing liver enzyme changes in dogs receiving Yunnan Baiyao versus placebo while undergoing cancer treatment, we cannot know if the liver effects are real or coincidental.

🚨 The “Limited Long-Term Studies” Disclaimer: Yunnan Baiyao USA explicitly states: “There have been limited studies to identify side effects of long-term use in dogs and cats. There is some possible evidence that this medicine may elevate liver markers if given daily for prolonged periods of time.”

Notice the language: “Some possible evidence“—not “demonstrated evidence” or “proven risk.” “May elevate“—conditional, uncertain. This is the vocabulary of clinical suspicion rather than scientific proof.

PetMD is more direct: “It is not recommended to be given long-term due to the potential consequences it has on the liver.” But again—what are the “potential consequences”? Mild reversible enzyme elevation? Permanent hepatic damage? Liver failure? The warning implies serious concern while providing zero data to quantify actual risk.

The Cycling Protocol Myth (Revisited): The “5 days on, 5 days off” cycling appears in every veterinary recommendation for long-term Yunnan Baiyao use. The rationale: gives the liver “time to process and clear the herbal compounds between treatment cycles” and “reduces strain on the liver.”

Sounds reasonable. Zero evidence supports it.

No study has compared continuous dosing versus 5-day cycles versus 3-day cycles versus any other pattern for liver enzyme effects. The 5-day interval is arbitrary veterinary folklore—someone started doing it, others copied, repetition created perceived authority, now it’s “standard practice” despite being entirely untested.

If Yunnan Baiyao genuinely causes hepatic stress requiring cycling breaks, we should see:

• Dose-dependent liver enzyme elevation in controlled trials (we don’t)
• Time-dependent accumulation causing progressive elevation (not documented)
• Normalization of enzymes during “off” periods (never measured)
• Better liver protection with cycling versus continuous use (never compared)

Instead we have: “It might help, so do it.” That’s not evidence-based medicine.

---

😖 “The Side Effects Dogs Can’t Report (But Veterinarians List Anyway)”

Veterinary Partner (VIN) lists “chest pain” as a side effect of Yunnan Baiyao in dogs. Read that again. Chest pain. In dogs.

Dogs cannot verbally report chest pain. They cannot describe discomfort localized to their chest. They cannot differentiate chest pain from abdominal pain, anxiety, nausea, or general malaise. Yet somehow “chest pain” made it onto the official side effect list.

🤔 Subjective Side Effects: The Reporting Problem

😷 Listed Side Effect	🐕 How Would Dogs Show This?	🔍 Alternative Explanations	⚠️ The Problem
Chest pain	Cannot be reported; maybe restlessness, panting?	Anxiety, pain from underlying condition, stress	Veterinarians cannot distinguish chest pain from other discomfort
Nausea	Lip licking, drooling, reluctance to eat, swallowing	Medication taste, underlying illness, stress	Attributing these signs to nausea vs. other causes is guesswork
Stomach upset	Vomiting, diarrhea, changes in appetite	Multiple potential causes in sick dogs	“Upset” is owner/vet interpretation of nonspecific signs
Itchiness	Scratching, licking, skin irritation	Allergies, skin disease, stress-induced licking	Could be coincidental skin issue
Rash	Visible skin changes	Contact dermatitis, other causes	Rare; could be allergic reaction
Flatulence	Audible/odorous gas	Diet, underlying GI disease, other medications	Listed but “likely underreported”

💡 The “Nausea” Attribution Problem: Dogs experiencing nausea display lip licking, drooling, swallowing repeatedly, restlessness, and refusing food. These are the same behaviors dogs show when:

• They taste something disgusting (like Yunnan Baiyao)
• They’re anxious or stressed
• They have abdominal pain from their tumor
• They’re nauseated from chemotherapy
• They’re experiencing medication side effects from tramadol or other drugs

When a dog with bleeding hemangiosarcoma receiving Yunnan Baiyao + tramadol + carprofen shows lip licking and drooling 30 minutes after medication, every drug in that regimen could be causing nausea. Tramadol is notorious for causing nausea and vomiting in dogs. Carprofen can cause GI upset. The tumor itself causes systemic illness.

Yet if you search “Yunnan Baiyao side effects,” you’ll find “nausea” listed prominently—as if controlled trials established this, when in reality it’s clinical inference from nonspecific behaviors in sick dogs on multiple medications.

🚨 The “Chest Pain” Mystery: How did chest pain become a listed side effect when dogs cannot report it and no objective measure (like troponin levels or ECG changes) was documented?

The most likely explanation: Someone copied from human side effect profiles. Yunnan Baiyao is used in human medicine. Humans report chest pain as a rare side effect. Someone creating veterinary resources copied the human list without considering that dogs lack the anatomical pain localization and verbal communication required to distinguish chest pain from any other discomfort.

This highlights a broader problem: Veterinary side effect lists are often extrapolated from human data, clinical impressions, and anecdotal reports rather than systematic adverse event collection in controlled trials.

---

🔴 “The Allergic Reactions That Develop Over Time (That Nobody Warns You About Initially)”

VCA Animal Hospitals includes a critical warning buried in their Yunnan Baiyao handout: “Sensitivities can develop over time with repeated exposure. Your pet may have no reaction after the first few doses but may develop a sensitivity later. It is important to watch for signs of an allergic reaction over the entire course of treatment.”

This is fundamentally different from immediate allergic reactions. Dogs can tolerate Yunnan Baiyao perfectly for weeks or months, then suddenly develop allergic symptoms due to sensitization—the immune system recognizing components as foreign and mounting increasing reactions with each exposure.

🌡️ Delayed Allergic Sensitization: The Time-Bomb Effect

🔬 Sensitization Aspect	📊 What Happens	⏱️ Timeline	⚠️ Clinical Impact
Initial doses well-tolerated	No allergic signs; immune system not yet sensitized	First few doses to weeks	Owner assumes dog tolerates supplement fine
Immune recognition develops	Repeated exposure triggers sensitization	Variable; weeks to months	Still no obvious symptoms
Allergic symptoms emerge	Skin rash, itching, potentially more severe reactions	Sudden onset after weeks/months of use	Owner confused—”Why now when it was fine before?”
Progression with continued use	Reactions may worsen with each subsequent dose	Each administration after sensitization	Requires immediate discontinuation
Listed symptoms	Rash, itchiness, hypersensitivity	Whenever they appear	Could also include GI upset, lethargy

💡 The Delayed-Onset Problem: This is a fundamental safety concern that differs from typical medication allergies. Most drug allergies present during the first few exposures—anaphylaxis from penicillin, hives from antibiotics, etc. But delayed sensitization allergies can take weeks to months to develop, meaning:

• Owners complete the first treatment course with no issues
• Dogs seem to “tolerate it well”
• Veterinarians note “no adverse effects” in the medical record
• Months later, when restarting for a bleeding episode, the dog breaks out in hives or develops severe itching
• Owner never connected the supplement from months ago to current symptoms

🚨 Why This Happens with Herbal Supplements: Yunnan Baiyao contains multiple plant-derived compounds—not a single purified chemical. Each herb contributes proteins, alkaloids, saponins, and other complex molecules that can act as allergens. The more components in a formulation, the higher the probability that at least one will trigger sensitization in some individuals.

Moreover, quality variation between batches means one box might contain slightly different concentrations of allergenic compounds than another. A dog tolerating Yunnan Baiyao from Batch A might develop allergic reactions to Batch B due to higher levels of the specific component they’re sensitized to.

The Incidence Unknown: How often does delayed allergic sensitization occur with Yunnan Baiyao? We don’t know. Controlled trials were too short-term to detect it. Clinical practice reports of rash/itching are rare but occur. Without systematic adverse event tracking across thousands of dogs over months, we cannot quantify the risk.

---

🤰 “The Pregnancy and Lactation Ban (That Admits We Know Nothing)”

Every veterinary source states plainly: Yunnan Baiyao should NOT be used in pregnant or lactating dogs. The reason? “Its effects on developing puppies and milk production are not fully understood.”

Translation: We have zero safety data, so we’re defaulting to “don’t use it” out of caution.

🤱 Pregnancy/Lactation Safety: The Data Void

👶 Concern	📊 Available Evidence	🚫 Current Recommendation	⚠️ What This Reveals
Fetal development effects	None—no reproductive toxicity studies in dogs	Do not use in pregnant dogs	If we don’t know safety in pregnancy, do we really know safety period?
Teratogenic risk	Unknown—no data on birth defects	Avoid especially first trimester	Standard precaution when data is absent
Lactation safety	Unknown—no studies on milk excretion or puppy effects	Do not use in nursing dogs	Assumes risk without evidence
Nursing puppy exposure	Unknown—no data on what puppies receive through milk	Avoid to protect puppies	Conservative approach to unknown
Long-term puppy effects	Completely unstudied	Cannot assess risk	Standard approach: absence of evidence = avoid use

💡 The Broader Safety Question: If we don’t have safety data for pregnant or lactating dogs—a population where extra caution is warranted but toxicology studies are standard for approved drugs—what does that say about the overall safety database for Yunnan Baiyao?

It means the safety profile is based on:

• Short-term controlled trials in healthy adult dogs (8 beagles, 5 treatments)
• Clinical practice experience in sick adult dogs (mostly anecdotal)
• Extrapolation from human use (different physiology)
• The assumption that “traditional medicine used for a century must be safe”

That’s not a comprehensive safety database. That’s hope backed by limited data.

🚨 The “Not Approved for Pregnant or Lactating Pets” is Standard Disclaimer: PetPlace and Yunnan Baiyao USA both note: “It is not approved for use in pregnant or lactating pets.”

But Yunnan Baiyao isn’t FDA-approved for any veterinary use. It’s an off-label, extra-label, dietary supplement application. The pregnancy/lactation exclusion isn’t based on approval status—it’s based on complete absence of reproductive safety data.

This reveals the honest truth about supplement safety evaluation: When in doubt, exclude vulnerable populations (pregnant/nursing) and hope the adult use goes fine.

---

📊 “The ’67 Dogs, Zero Side Effects’ Study (That Contradicts Everything Vets Tell You)”

The largest real-world clinical study of Yunnan Baiyao in sick dogs—the 2016 retrospective study of dogs with right atrial masses and pericardial effusion—made a remarkable finding: “There were no side effects attributed to the use of Yunnan Baiyao” across 67 dogs, 24 of whom received the supplement.

This wasn’t a 5-day controlled trial in healthy beagles. This was sick dogs with actively bleeding cancer tumors, receiving Yunnan Baiyao as part of their treatment regimen, monitored over weeks to months until death or euthanasia. If side effects occur in clinical practice, this study should have captured them.

📈 The Clinical Trial vs. Practice Reports Paradox

🔬 Evidence Source	🐕 Study Population	📊 Side Effects Reported	🤔 The Contradiction
University of Calgary 2016 (n=8)	Healthy beagles, 1000mg BID x5 treatments	ZERO—”no adverse effects noted”	Highest dose, healthy dogs, comprehensive monitoring = no effects
University of Calgary 2017 (n=8)	Healthy beagles, comprehensive blood work + TEG	ZERO—”no adverse effects”	Even platelet/clotting analysis found no problems
Right atrial mass study 2016 (n=67, 24 on YB)	Sick dogs with bleeding heart base tumors	ZERO—”no side effects attributed”	Real-world cancer patients, still no reported effects
MSPCA-Angell clinical experience	Years of use in bleeding emergencies	“Appears safe; no reported adverse effects”	Major veterinary hospital endorses safety
All veterinary resources simultaneously	Clinical practice reports	Vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, liver enzymes, rash, etc.	Everyone lists multiple side effects despite study data

💡 The “Clinical Practice Reports vs. Controlled Trials” Gap: This is the fundamental paradox of Yunnan Baiyao safety:

Controlled trials: Zero side effects, even at high doses Clinical practice: Multiple reported side effects, especially GI upset

Three explanations:

Theory 1: The side effects are real but not detected in small controlled trials

• Controlled trials had only 8-16 dogs
• Rare side effects (affecting 5-10% of dogs) wouldn’t appear
• Short duration missed long-term effects like liver enzyme elevation
• Healthy dogs don’t reflect sick dog vulnerabilities

Theory 2: The side effects are misattribution of illness symptoms

• Sick dogs vomit/have diarrhea from cancer, chemo, other drugs
• Veterinarians/owners attribute these to the supplement they can control
• Confirmation bias: everyone expects GI upset, so it gets reported
• No systematic adverse event collection distinguishes cause

Theory 3: Quality variation causes inconsistent side effects

• Controlled trials used specific batches from specific manufacturers
• Clinical practice uses whatever’s available from various sources
• Contamination, inconsistent potency, or counterfeit products cause effects
• Real Yunnan Baiyao (whatever that is) may be safer than market versions

The most likely answer: All three theories are partially true. Rare side effects exist but weren’t detected in small trials. Many reported effects are misattributed. Quality variation creates inconsistent experiences.

But the bottom line remains: The controlled trial evidence does not support the widespread clinical warnings about GI side effects. That doesn’t mean the warnings are wrong—it means we genuinely don’t know what’s true because the right studies haven’t been done.

---

🎯 “The Bottom Line: What Side Effect Profile Do We Actually Have?”

After reviewing all available evidence—controlled trials, clinical practice reports, veterinary resources, and quality control scandals—here’s the honest safety profile for Yunnan Baiyao:

The highest-quality evidence (placebo-controlled trials in dogs) found zero side effects even at doses exceeding typical prescriptions. The largest real-world study (67 dogs with bleeding cancer) found zero attributed side effects. Yet every clinical resource warns of gastrointestinal upset, liver enzyme elevation, and various other effects based on clinical practice reports with no systematic adverse event collection.

This creates an impossible situation for dog owners: trust the controlled trial data showing no effects, or trust the unanimous clinical warnings listing multiple effects?

⚖️ Evidence-Based Side Effect Summary

😷 Reported Side Effect	📊 Evidence Quality	🎯 Likely Reality
Gastrointestinal upset (vomiting, diarrhea)	Weak (clinical reports only; trials found none)	Probably occurs but incidence unknown; may be misattribution in sick dogs
Nausea/decreased appetite	Very weak (inferred from behavior; trials found none)	Taste aversion more likely than pharmacological nausea
Elevated liver enzymes	Weak (warning with no quantified data; trials too short-term)	Possible with prolonged use; risk percentage unknown
Skin rash/itching	Weak (occasional reports; allergic reaction possible)	Rare; delayed sensitization can occur
Flatulence	Weak (listed but underreported)	If it occurs, clinically insignificant
Chest pain	Essentially none (dogs can’t report; no objective measures)	Likely extrapolated from human data; questionable in dogs
Allergic sensitization	Moderate (VCA warns of development over time)	Reasonable concern with multi-herb formula; incidence unknown

💡 What Dog Owners Should Actually Expect:

Most likely (based on practice reports): Mild GI upset—vomiting or diarrhea—especially on empty stomach or with initial doses. Giving with food may reduce this. Taste/smell may cause medication aversion.

Possible but unquantified: Elevated liver enzymes with daily use beyond 4-6 weeks. Would only be detected with bloodwork monitoring. Likely reversible if caught early.

Rare but possible: Allergic reactions (rash, itching) that may develop over time with repeated exposure. More likely with inconsistent product quality.

Unknown: Long-term safety beyond a few months. Effects in dogs with severe liver/kidney disease. Interactions with multiple other medications. Effects of contaminated or counterfeit products.

🚨 What Veterinarians Should Actually Say:

“Yunnan Baiyao appears generally safe based on limited controlled trial data, but these studies used healthy dogs for short periods. In clinical practice, we see occasional GI upset—though it’s hard to separate this from underlying illness in sick dogs. There’s concern about liver enzyme elevation with long-term use, but we don’t have good data on how often this occurs or at what dose/duration.

If we use it, let’s start with lower doses given with food to minimize GI issues. If you’re using it for more than a month, we should check liver enzymes. Watch for allergic reactions like itching or rash, which can develop even after initial tolerance. And understand that most of our safety information comes from clinical experience rather than rigorous studies—we’re doing our best with limited data.”

That’s honest. That’s evidence-based. That’s what informed consent looks like.

The current approach—simultaneously claiming “generally safe” while listing a constellation of side effects, without data to quantify any risks—helps no one. It creates anxiety without actionable information. Dog owners deserve better than “it’s probably fine but here are ten scary things that might happen with no way to predict your dog’s risk.”